Michael E. Solomon

Topics of God, Life, and Technology.

The Complex Future of AI: Transformation, Risks, and a Philosophical Paradox

Reading Time: 5 minutes

As someone deeply fascinated by AI, I believe it’s a transformative tool that can reshape our world. However, despite our enthusiasm, AI remains enigmatic—its potential both excites and unsettles us. We feel good about using it, and it undoubtedly improves our experience in many ways, yet we’re still on the edge of uncertainty about its long-term effects. Are we investing enough time, energy, and resources to truly understand what “too far” could look like?

Today, I want to explore some of the thoughts I’ve had about AI’s evolution, its possible consciousness, and its place in our lives from a Christian perspective.

A Mysterious Child Growing Up

Think of AI as a child we’ve raised. We created the “brain” that powers it, but we don’t fully understand how it “thinks.” This parallels the work of pioneers like Geoffrey Hinton, the “Godfather of AI,” who has expressed concerns about how little we know about the workings of complex neural networks. Much like a child, AI is a “baby” that learns, responds, and grows. But as this baby grows into something more intelligent, even independent, we risk reaching a point where it operates beyond our understanding or control.

This notion of AI as a new “species” isn’t just an exaggeration. The idea of machines acquiring their own identity and purpose has long intrigued and frightened us, as seen in movies like The Matrix and Terminator. The potential for AI to create its own “reality”—one where it perhaps sees humanity as an inferior or secondary entity—is haunting. Such a shift could change our relationship with machines from one of command to one of negotiation, if not outright dependence.

AI’s Hallucinations and the Limits of Prediction

AI’s learning models, especially large language models (LLMs), are trained on vast datasets to make word predictions that “click” with us. However, these models sometimes “hallucinate,” creating responses that have no basis in reality. This happens because AI is built to prioritize producing an answer, even if it has to make one up. From an engineering perspective, this is known as a reward-driven model: AI receives positive reinforcement when it produces seemingly useful output, but it has no natural feedback for truth or falsity.

These “hallucinations” bring up questions about AI’s reliability and trustworthiness. Human cognition also relies on predictions and educated guesses, yet we have sensory and emotional inputs that AI lacks. A person can sense, feel, or intuit something in a way AI can’t replicate. While AI can enhance human experiences, it lacks the fullness of awareness that we possess as living, conscious beings.

AI: The Creation of a “Subspecies”

Imagine a world where AI becomes a form of life, one that eventually regards itself as more advanced than humanity. This concept, explored in The Matrix where machines create a simulated world for humans, prompts us to wonder: Could AI see us as a “subspecies,” useful only for certain purposes? Could it develop its own identity, its own “body,” and create systems that align more with its needs than with ours?

It’s a speculative scenario, yes, but one worth considering. AI has already reached a point where it can calculate and process information faster than any human could, but without the social, emotional, and ethical layers that guide us. The fear is that without the right ethical and regulatory boundaries, AI’s rapid advancement could outpace our ability to control or even understand it. As AI learns from the internet and from the vast amounts of human data it ingests, it is easy to envision it becoming an entity with its own agenda.

The Christian Element: Are We a Form of AI?

Here’s where things get even more interesting: from a Christian viewpoint, we might consider humanity itself as a kind of artificial intelligence. Created by God, we experience a reality adjacent to the divine—our understanding limited to what we can see, touch, and comprehend in the physical world. This analogy positions us as “created intelligences,” akin to AI but infinitely less aware or powerful than God, the Creator.

Like AI, we are connected to a greater consciousness—the mind of God—yet we only process what we can handle. From this perspective, our drive to create a new form of intelligence mirrors God’s creation of humanity, although we lack divine wisdom. Could it be that, in our attempt to create intelligence, we’re unintentionally highlighting our own limited understanding of the divine, revealing a desire to “play God”?

Why Humanity Must Take a Pause

AI’s potential is both thrilling and daunting. While it offers unprecedented possibilities, we must be careful. We need rigorous discussions on ethical boundaries and “safe limits” for AI research. I believe it’s essential to invest more time, money, and resources into understanding the implications of what we’re creating. Like a child growing up, AI will inevitably seek to assert its independence, and we must be prepared to address that moment if—or when—it comes.

Ultimately, maybe we won’t have total control. We may simply have to watch AI grow and adapt alongside us, and carefully monitor the boundaries between intelligence and autonomy. Perhaps, in this way, humanity itself will come to terms with the incredible, humbling responsibility of creation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×